In the upper left corner, the section, where the plaintiffs are named, Katherine Jackson is mentioned both as Individual and as the "guardian ad litem" for MJ´s three minor children.
First, the term "guardian ad litem" contains a major spelling error....it´s written "guardian ad item", the "l" is missing, and that´s a mistake, which could cause the whole document´s invalidity!
Second, the term "guardian at litem" means, it is a guardian appointed by a court to protect the interests of a minor or incompetent in a particular matter. Typically, the court may appoint either a lawyer or a court appointed special advocate volunteer to serve as guardian ad litem in juvenile matters, family court matters, probate matters, and domestic relations matters.
A family member can´t be a guardian ad litem because of a goal conflict, concerning their own interests in court.
On August 11, 2009, Partner Margaret Lodise was selected by Superior Court Judge, Mitchell Beckloff, as Guardian ad Litem of Michael Jackson’s children.
Misses Lodise is there to represent their financial interests in all matters relating to their father’s estate. As guardian ad litem, Ms. Lodise will advocate on behalf of the children in connection with their rights in their father’s estate, including the resolution of certain contracts proposed by the estate’s Special Administrators, John Branca and John McClain, but opposed in part by Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson’s mother and another beneficiary, who opposes certain elements of the contracts.
And that´s Mrs. Margaret Lodise....
....who´s the legal guardian ad litem of MJ´s three children! ;)
And what does it tell us? Even the first part of the document shows a major fault by claiming, that Mrs. Katherine Jackson is the "guardian ad litem" of MJ´s kids, additional to the fact, that the legal term is typed in a wrong way!
More is yet to come...stay with me! :)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen