"....therefore plead 'not guilty'!" Dr. Conrad Murray´s words from yesterday´s arraignment.
I didn´t expect anything else, do you? ;)
Today I dared to read the comment section on TMZ, where an article was published, and I´ve to admit, I was a bit shocked.
Either a comment was about MJ being a drug addict and responsible for this "death" or Dr. Murray was blamed in a horrible way, was called names like "sh*tbag" or "murderer".
Obviously, just a few people are willing or able to listen, what really happened in court, when the preliminary hearing took place. Most of the witnesses´statements contradicted each other, like "MJ was laying on the bed, he was laying on the floor, later he was laying in bed, when the paramedics arrived"...."he was cold" vs. "he was warm to the touch"...."he was dead for hours" vs. "he was revived at the UCLA, had a weak pulse and a heartbeat according to the medical records"....ever tried to revive a person, who´s dead for longer? No comment! Ö_ö
By the way, drug addiction is beginning to tell in the "garbage disposal" organs, the liver and the kidneys. Interestingly, both didn´t show any sign of distruction, they were determined to be healthy! So I´d say, the question about MJ being a drug addict, is done!
One needs to be blind to not see all the discrepancies!
I´ve noticed, people are very fast in judging without knowing the facts, and that reminds me of the terrible trial, MJ went through in 2005. The media and most of the people pre-judged him, even before his trial took place. And after he was acquitted of all counts, he´s still labeled to be a child molester. Sad, very sad! But in this case, the Dr. Murray case, it happens again!
Indifferent, if you think, MJ is dead or alive, think about it!
Have a wonderful day! :)
Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2011
Sonntag, 16. Januar 2011
Dr. Murray´s preliminary hearing....
Good morning, my friends,
as you all know, the preliminary hearing is already over, on day 6 the prosecution decided to rest....out of the blue! 35 witnesses of the prosecution were allegedly announced to take the stand, but after hearing 20, they "closed the case" to force Judge Pastor to make his decision.
And the judge made exactly the decision, obviously nobody expected...he ordered Dr. Murray to stand the trial of involuntary manslaughter.
Half of the twitter world broke down, then the hell broke loose....and I saw people, who believed, MJ is still alive, doubting nearly everything!
Honestly, guys, did you really expect a different decision?
What did you see and notice during the hearing?
I saw witnesses, whose statements didn´t make sense in any way, and I saw a prosecution and a defense team, who didn´t ask the "right" questions....neither to clear discrepancies nor to stress their strategies!
An example....one of the paramedics stated, they´d found MJ laying on the bed, when they arrived.....Alvarez has stated, Dr. Murray and he´d have placed MJ on the floor during the 911 call....NO questions to clear that up!
And there´s way more!
Oh, and on January 25, 2011, it´s just Dr. Murray´s arraingement, it means, he´ll be officially charged with involuntary manslaughter, no more, no less. And the judge will determine, when the trial will start.
Open your eyes! More is yet to come! ;)
Have a wonderful sunday everybody!
as you all know, the preliminary hearing is already over, on day 6 the prosecution decided to rest....out of the blue! 35 witnesses of the prosecution were allegedly announced to take the stand, but after hearing 20, they "closed the case" to force Judge Pastor to make his decision.
And the judge made exactly the decision, obviously nobody expected...he ordered Dr. Murray to stand the trial of involuntary manslaughter.
Half of the twitter world broke down, then the hell broke loose....and I saw people, who believed, MJ is still alive, doubting nearly everything!
Honestly, guys, did you really expect a different decision?
What did you see and notice during the hearing?
I saw witnesses, whose statements didn´t make sense in any way, and I saw a prosecution and a defense team, who didn´t ask the "right" questions....neither to clear discrepancies nor to stress their strategies!
An example....one of the paramedics stated, they´d found MJ laying on the bed, when they arrived.....Alvarez has stated, Dr. Murray and he´d have placed MJ on the floor during the 911 call....NO questions to clear that up!
And there´s way more!
Oh, and on January 25, 2011, it´s just Dr. Murray´s arraingement, it means, he´ll be officially charged with involuntary manslaughter, no more, no less. And the judge will determine, when the trial will start.
Open your eyes! More is yet to come! ;)
Have a wonderful sunday everybody!
Dienstag, 11. Januar 2011
Sonntag, 2. Januar 2011
Prince Michael I. should testify in court on tuesday?
Hey guys,
and here we go again! ;)
Just found an interesting article about MJ´s eldest son, Prince Michael I., who should be called a witness for Dr. Murray´s defense team to testify, MJ should have self-administered drugs long before June 25, 2009.
Celeb Watch
"Late singer Michael Jackson's eldest son Prince Michael might be asked to testify in court in his father's death case. The 13-year-old is likely to be called by defence lawyers for Conrad Murray, Jackson's personal physician, at a pre-trial hearing due to start in Los Angeles on Tuesday.
Murray could be jailed for up to four years for involuntary manslaughter. He has pleaded not guilty.
Murray's lawyers claim that he gave Jackson only 25 milligrams of the anaesthetic propofol on June 25, 2009, the day he died, not the massive overdose that killed him and that the singer added more of the drug to his intravenous drip while Murray was in the bathroom.
The lawyers claim they will try to prove that Jackson had a history of "self-medicating".
"What Jackson's children may have seen in the past could be crucial to the defence. If they ever, even once, saw their father administer his own drugs, it will give veracity to Murray's claim," express.co.uk quoted a source close to the case as saying.
There's also a possibility that Jackson's other two kids Paris, 12, and Prince Michael II, 8, could be called to the witness stand.
The source said: "No one wants to put any youngster through the mill like that but what those kids may have seen could be key to whether there were precedents of Jackson self-medicating.
"The likelihood is that the eldest boy alone will be questioned under oath, with his siblings spared the ordeal of having to relive the most painful memories of their lives."
I´ve to admit, first I was laughing, 'cause the imagination of a family member being a witness for the defense is more than funny but ironic, then I thought deeper.
It´s not long ago, that it was stated, Ed Chernoff, Dr. Murray´s lawyer, wouldn´t ask just one question at the preliminary hearing on tuesday but only listen to the prosecution´s accusations, when they´ll present the case in court.
Then it was reported, the defense team would argue, that MJ was a drug addict long before he was treated by Dr. Murray, including self-administration of any kind of medicine.
Now we´ve stepped further and here´s the presentation of MJ´s eldest son to be a witness for his father´s alleged "drug abuse" in former times.
From "no questions at the preliminary hearing" to "MJ´s son should testify his father´s former drug abuse" in less than no time....that´s a really fast process..... ;)
By the way, what´s the expectation of the statement, MJ self-administered meds? As long as it´s unknown, what kind of meds he might have administered himself, there´s no proof in court, which is relevant!
Or do they expect, Prince Michael I. might know, what MJ did self-administer, just in case he really should have done anything like that?
The Autopsy Report doesn´t show any kind of organ deseases, neither the liver nor the kidneys are destroyed in any way or just show any signs, which would point to a former extensive drug abuse!
And whatever Prince Michael I. might have seen, it could be nearly everything, that MJ might have administered himself, even vitamins to stay healthy!
You see, my current statement about the article is most likely the best argument for the prosecution to prove Dr. Murray guilty....so, why should the defense use this trail, which is definately Dr. Murray´s demise?
As simple as it is, the ridicule of this alleged "strategy" just shows pure scorn for the trial against Dr. Murray in general. Or would a well payed lawyer like Ed Chernoff jeopardize his reputation? Or would Michael Flanagan, a specialist for Propofol involved cases with a good name, do so? No! But feeding the tabloids with information from so called "sources close to the case" is a stroke of genius! And who´d you think, is behind the curtain? No victim, no crime, no suspect! ;)
Have a wonderful sunday! ;)
and here we go again! ;)
Just found an interesting article about MJ´s eldest son, Prince Michael I., who should be called a witness for Dr. Murray´s defense team to testify, MJ should have self-administered drugs long before June 25, 2009.
Celeb Watch
Michael Jackson's son may testify - London, January 02, 2011
Murray could be jailed for up to four years for involuntary manslaughter. He has pleaded not guilty.
Murray's lawyers claim that he gave Jackson only 25 milligrams of the anaesthetic propofol on June 25, 2009, the day he died, not the massive overdose that killed him and that the singer added more of the drug to his intravenous drip while Murray was in the bathroom.
The lawyers claim they will try to prove that Jackson had a history of "self-medicating".
"What Jackson's children may have seen in the past could be crucial to the defence. If they ever, even once, saw their father administer his own drugs, it will give veracity to Murray's claim," express.co.uk quoted a source close to the case as saying.
There's also a possibility that Jackson's other two kids Paris, 12, and Prince Michael II, 8, could be called to the witness stand.
The source said: "No one wants to put any youngster through the mill like that but what those kids may have seen could be key to whether there were precedents of Jackson self-medicating.
"The likelihood is that the eldest boy alone will be questioned under oath, with his siblings spared the ordeal of having to relive the most painful memories of their lives."
I´ve to admit, first I was laughing, 'cause the imagination of a family member being a witness for the defense is more than funny but ironic, then I thought deeper.
It´s not long ago, that it was stated, Ed Chernoff, Dr. Murray´s lawyer, wouldn´t ask just one question at the preliminary hearing on tuesday but only listen to the prosecution´s accusations, when they´ll present the case in court.
Then it was reported, the defense team would argue, that MJ was a drug addict long before he was treated by Dr. Murray, including self-administration of any kind of medicine.
Now we´ve stepped further and here´s the presentation of MJ´s eldest son to be a witness for his father´s alleged "drug abuse" in former times.
From "no questions at the preliminary hearing" to "MJ´s son should testify his father´s former drug abuse" in less than no time....that´s a really fast process..... ;)
By the way, what´s the expectation of the statement, MJ self-administered meds? As long as it´s unknown, what kind of meds he might have administered himself, there´s no proof in court, which is relevant!
Or do they expect, Prince Michael I. might know, what MJ did self-administer, just in case he really should have done anything like that?
The Autopsy Report doesn´t show any kind of organ deseases, neither the liver nor the kidneys are destroyed in any way or just show any signs, which would point to a former extensive drug abuse!
And whatever Prince Michael I. might have seen, it could be nearly everything, that MJ might have administered himself, even vitamins to stay healthy!
You see, my current statement about the article is most likely the best argument for the prosecution to prove Dr. Murray guilty....so, why should the defense use this trail, which is definately Dr. Murray´s demise?
As simple as it is, the ridicule of this alleged "strategy" just shows pure scorn for the trial against Dr. Murray in general. Or would a well payed lawyer like Ed Chernoff jeopardize his reputation? Or would Michael Flanagan, a specialist for Propofol involved cases with a good name, do so? No! But feeding the tabloids with information from so called "sources close to the case" is a stroke of genius! And who´d you think, is behind the curtain? No victim, no crime, no suspect! ;)
Have a wonderful sunday! ;)
Samstag, 1. Januar 2011
The Discovery Channel´s documentary is "postponed indefinitely"....
Good morning, my friends, and a very Happy New Year to each of you! :)
Welcome to 2011!
And we even got run over by the newest MJ-stories, so I´d assume, nothing has changed! ;)
Let´s talk about....
The Discovery Channel´s documentary about MJ´s alleged autopsy, which should have been aired on January 13 in Western Europe and the UK, has been "postponed indefinitely"...so far, so good....and I see fans celebrating this "event" as if it was them, who reached this goal!
Maybe I´m narrow-minded, but the statement of the Discovery Channel does NOT refer to the fans and their petitions in any way! They just refer to the estate´s request, but above all, they refer to the upcoming and ongoing court case, Dr. Murray´s preliminary hearing, which will start on tuesday, January 4!
Yes, maybe they were pressured by other media institutions, who published the estate´s letter to Discovery Channel, and that might have led them to postpone the documentary.....but it was not the fans!
As much as I like the idea of "united we´re able to make anything happen", it was not, what happened here!
Stone me, if you like, but that´s, what´s written in every article around the world!
Some of those articles are titled "Discovery Channel cancelled the autopsy show", but according to the wording of the Channel´s statement, that´s also not correct! They postponed it indefinitely, which means, they might air it at a future date!
Honestly, guys, what did you expect to see in this documentary? The opening of a body with an Y-Shape??? The opening of a person´s head to remove the brain??? Shamone!
The Discovery´s show should have been "an unofficial, fictional account of what the autopsy must have been like and its results."
So the wording of the statement.....and we already know the autopsy report and its content, so, how much more worse could the documentary have been???
As for me, the argument of "protecting MJ´s and his family´s privacy" does not count....wanna know why?
What´s more violating a person´s privacy than the whole world knowing of "his penis appeared to be uncircumsized"????
Oh, and we won´t foget the VH1 special, which was aired some months ago, presenting the alleged "last hours of MJ´s life", using an actor, looking similiar to MJ.....and that was not unethical and violating MJ´s privacy??? Ö_ö
The autopsy report is nothing more than a joke and full of major errors, the documentary should have been based on this official autopsy report, to which conclusion does this lead us?
Just think about it!
By the way, who says, the documentary was for real? ;)
Have a wonderful day!
Welcome to 2011!
And we even got run over by the newest MJ-stories, so I´d assume, nothing has changed! ;)
Let´s talk about....
The Discovery Channel´s documentary about MJ´s alleged autopsy, which should have been aired on January 13 in Western Europe and the UK, has been "postponed indefinitely"...so far, so good....and I see fans celebrating this "event" as if it was them, who reached this goal!
Maybe I´m narrow-minded, but the statement of the Discovery Channel does NOT refer to the fans and their petitions in any way! They just refer to the estate´s request, but above all, they refer to the upcoming and ongoing court case, Dr. Murray´s preliminary hearing, which will start on tuesday, January 4!
Yes, maybe they were pressured by other media institutions, who published the estate´s letter to Discovery Channel, and that might have led them to postpone the documentary.....but it was not the fans!
As much as I like the idea of "united we´re able to make anything happen", it was not, what happened here!
Stone me, if you like, but that´s, what´s written in every article around the world!
Some of those articles are titled "Discovery Channel cancelled the autopsy show", but according to the wording of the Channel´s statement, that´s also not correct! They postponed it indefinitely, which means, they might air it at a future date!
Honestly, guys, what did you expect to see in this documentary? The opening of a body with an Y-Shape??? The opening of a person´s head to remove the brain??? Shamone!
The Discovery´s show should have been "an unofficial, fictional account of what the autopsy must have been like and its results."
So the wording of the statement.....and we already know the autopsy report and its content, so, how much more worse could the documentary have been???
As for me, the argument of "protecting MJ´s and his family´s privacy" does not count....wanna know why?
What´s more violating a person´s privacy than the whole world knowing of "his penis appeared to be uncircumsized"????
Oh, and we won´t foget the VH1 special, which was aired some months ago, presenting the alleged "last hours of MJ´s life", using an actor, looking similiar to MJ.....and that was not unethical and violating MJ´s privacy??? Ö_ö
The autopsy report is nothing more than a joke and full of major errors, the documentary should have been based on this official autopsy report, to which conclusion does this lead us?
Just think about it!
By the way, who says, the documentary was for real? ;)
Have a wonderful day!
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)