Sonntag, 2. Januar 2011

Prince Michael I. should testify in court on tuesday?

Hey guys,

and here we go again! ;)

Just found an interesting article about MJ´s eldest son, Prince Michael I., who should be called a witness for Dr. Murray´s defense team to testify, MJ should have self-administered drugs long before June 25, 2009.

Celeb Watch
Michael Jackson's son may testify - London, January 02, 2011
"Late singer Michael Jackson's eldest son Prince Michael might be asked to testify in court in his father's death case. The 13-year-old is likely to be called by defence lawyers for Conrad Murray, Jackson's personal physician, at a pre-trial hearing due to start in Los Angeles on Tuesday.

Murray could be jailed for up to four years for involuntary manslaughter. He has pleaded not guilty.
Murray's lawyers claim that he gave Jackson only 25 milligrams of the anaesthetic propofol on June 25, 2009, the day he died, not the massive overdose that killed him and that the singer added more of the drug to his ­intravenous drip while Murray was in the bathroom.
The lawyers claim they will try to prove that Jackson had a history of "self-medicating".
"What Jackson's children may have seen in the past could be crucial to the defence. If they ever, even once, saw their father administer his own drugs, it will give veracity to Murray's claim," express.co.uk quoted a source close to the case as saying.
There's also a possibility that Jackson's other two kids Paris, 12, and Prince Michael II, 8, could be called to the witness stand.
The source said: "No one wants to put any youngster through the mill like that but what those kids may have seen could be key to whether there were precedents of Jackson self-medicating.
"The likelihood is that the eldest boy alone will be questioned under oath, with his siblings spared the ordeal of having to relive the most painful memories of their lives."

I´ve to admit, first I was laughing, 'cause the imagination of a family member being a witness for the defense is more than funny but ironic, then I thought deeper.
It´s not long ago, that it was stated, Ed Chernoff, Dr. Murray´s lawyer, wouldn´t ask just one question at the preliminary hearing on tuesday but only listen to the prosecution´s accusations, when they´ll present the case in court.
Then it was reported, the defense team would argue, that MJ was a drug addict long before he was treated by Dr. Murray, including self-administration of any kind of medicine.
Now we´ve stepped further and here´s the presentation of MJ´s eldest son to be a witness for his father´s alleged "drug abuse" in former times.
From "no questions at the preliminary hearing" to "MJ´s son should testify his father´s former drug abuse" in less than no time....that´s a really fast process..... ;)

By the way, what´s the expectation of the statement, MJ self-administered meds? As long as it´s unknown, what kind of meds he might have administered himself, there´s no proof in court, which is relevant!
Or do they expect, Prince Michael I. might know, what MJ did self-administer, just in case he really should have done anything like that?
The Autopsy Report doesn´t show any kind of organ deseases, neither the liver nor the kidneys are destroyed in any way or just show any signs, which would point to a former extensive drug abuse!
And whatever Prince Michael I. might have seen, it could be nearly everything, that MJ might have administered himself, even vitamins to stay healthy!

You see, my current statement about the article is most likely the best argument for the prosecution to prove Dr. Murray guilty....so, why should the defense use this trail, which is definately Dr. Murray´s demise?

As simple as it is, the ridicule of this alleged "strategy" just shows pure scorn for the trial against Dr. Murray in general. Or would a well payed lawyer like Ed Chernoff jeopardize his reputation? Or would Michael Flanagan, a specialist for Propofol involved cases with a good name, do so? No! But feeding the tabloids with information from so called "sources close to the case" is a stroke of genius! And who´d you think, is behind the curtain? No victim, no crime, no suspect! ;)

Have a wonderful sunday! ;)

Keine Kommentare:

Kommentar veröffentlichen