Montag, 7. März 2011
Mittwoch, 2. März 2011
The surveillance tapes from Holmby Hills....
Did you read the article about Judge Pastor not being "amused" at the prosecution´s request for a delay of the trial against Dr. Murray? They found fault with the defense´s "sloppy" behaviour to convey evidences. It´s normal for both parties to ask for a possible delay, when not any evidence is shared. There´s a simple reason, both parties need to be on the same level to be able to argue, act and react in a reasonable manner to avoid "surprises".
So the DA´s request is absolutely comprehensible and nothing to be worried about.
But one of judge Pastor´s statements got my attention....he ordered the DA to convey the SURVEILLANCE TAPES to the defense! The surveillance tapes? Those, which should have been available...or not? Those, its existence nobody really wanted to confirm?
So we have to assume, those tapes do exist and the DA were in possession of them but missed to hand over a copy to the defense? I´d be very interested in knowing the reason for it! What´s in evidence on the tapes, the DA wanted to prevent Dr. Murray´s legal team to see?
Honestly, would MJ allow his private bedroom being observed by cameras? I don´t think so! But hold on....he shouldn´t have "died" in his room, which should have been on the first floor of the mansion but in another room on the second floor. This statement is confirmed by Mrs. Elissa Fleak, Coroner Investigator and one of the first examinating the 'crime scene' on June 25, 2009.
So the rooms on the second floor were supposedly observed by cameras, otherwise surveillance tapes wouldn´t make any sense to be noted as evidences in court. But didn´t the bodyguards state during the preliminary hearing, that they weren´t allowed to enter the second floor because of privacy reasons?
No allowance to step on the floor, but observation of cameras for anybody to see every private move??? I highly doubt that, but it´s up to you to get your own conclusion. :)
By the way, claiming to not getting any available evidence but withholding evidences by themselves is a no-win situation for anybody involved.
Remember, the defense team requested the judge to mandate the examination of some vials from MJ´s rented mansion months ago, because the DA didn´t respond to their request for a long time. As for me, it sounds, as if the DA willingly withholds evidences and tries to get everything to be able to negotiate the case against Dr. Murray....because they´re feared to fail? ;)
And now it happened, judge Pastor postponed the trial to May 9...maybe....and it should last for about 6 weeks. Just thinking, wouldn´t the trial end around June 25? ;)
So the DA´s request is absolutely comprehensible and nothing to be worried about.
But one of judge Pastor´s statements got my attention....he ordered the DA to convey the SURVEILLANCE TAPES to the defense! The surveillance tapes? Those, which should have been available...or not? Those, its existence nobody really wanted to confirm?
So we have to assume, those tapes do exist and the DA were in possession of them but missed to hand over a copy to the defense? I´d be very interested in knowing the reason for it! What´s in evidence on the tapes, the DA wanted to prevent Dr. Murray´s legal team to see?
Honestly, would MJ allow his private bedroom being observed by cameras? I don´t think so! But hold on....he shouldn´t have "died" in his room, which should have been on the first floor of the mansion but in another room on the second floor. This statement is confirmed by Mrs. Elissa Fleak, Coroner Investigator and one of the first examinating the 'crime scene' on June 25, 2009.
So the rooms on the second floor were supposedly observed by cameras, otherwise surveillance tapes wouldn´t make any sense to be noted as evidences in court. But didn´t the bodyguards state during the preliminary hearing, that they weren´t allowed to enter the second floor because of privacy reasons?
No allowance to step on the floor, but observation of cameras for anybody to see every private move??? I highly doubt that, but it´s up to you to get your own conclusion. :)
By the way, claiming to not getting any available evidence but withholding evidences by themselves is a no-win situation for anybody involved.
Remember, the defense team requested the judge to mandate the examination of some vials from MJ´s rented mansion months ago, because the DA didn´t respond to their request for a long time. As for me, it sounds, as if the DA willingly withholds evidences and tries to get everything to be able to negotiate the case against Dr. Murray....because they´re feared to fail? ;)
And now it happened, judge Pastor postponed the trial to May 9...maybe....and it should last for about 6 weeks. Just thinking, wouldn´t the trial end around June 25? ;)
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)